Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01643
Original file (BC 2014 01643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01643
	 	COUNSEL: NONE
			HEARING DESIRED: NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  The Southwest Asia Service Medal be added to his DD Form 
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

2.  The National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) be added to his DD 
Form 214. (Will be administratively corrected)



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The Southwest Asia Service Medal and the NDSM were not in 
existence at the time of his discharge.

The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider 
his untimely application because he was not aware the aforesaid 
medals existed until this year.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214.

His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the applicant’s DD Form 214, he served in the 
Regular Air Force from 5 December 1986 to 3 January 1991 for a 
period of 4 years and 29 days.  His DD Form 214 does not 
refelect any Foreign Service time.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to add 
the Southwest Asia Service Medal to his DD Form 214.  The 
Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded to members of the United 
States armed forces who served in support of Operations DESERT 
SHIELD or DESERT STORM in one or more of the following areas 
from 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995: the Persian Gulf, 
Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian 
Sea that lies north of 100 north latitude and west 680 east 
longitude, as well as the total areas of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi 
Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.  
DPSID is unable to verify the applicant served in the area of 
eligibility for award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal. In 
addition, the applicant was not credited with any Foreign 
Service while on active duty.  To grant relief would be would be 
contrary to the criteria established by DoDM 1348.33, Manual of 
Military Decorations and Awards, the Secretary of the Air Force, 
Chief of Staff, and/or the War Department.

DPSID was able to verify the applicant's entitlement to the 
NDSM.  Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction 
of the applicant's official military personnel record will be 
completed by AFPC/DPSOR.

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 11 August 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 
30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit C).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the 
rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion that relief 
beyond that already granted administratively is not warranted.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.


The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 12 February 2015, under the provisions 
of AFI 36-2603:

       , Panel Chair
       , Member
       , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2014-
01643 was considered:

 Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 April 2014.
 Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 7 July 2014.
 Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 August 2014.




 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01046

    Original file (BC 2014 01046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01046 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards and decorations: Kuwait Liberation Medal-Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA) Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) Southwest Asia Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars (SWASM, w/3 BSSs). The SWASM is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who served in support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02260

    Original file (BC 2013 02260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for award of the VSM and the SWASM. DPSID states that the VSM is awarded to all service members of the Armed Services who between 4 Jul 1965 and 28 Mar 1973, served in the following areas...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00222

    Original file (BC-2013-00222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00222 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Her Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) be included on her DD Form 214. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04814

    Original file (BC 2013 04814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant believes the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider her untimely application because she did not realize the omission of her DESERT STORM service until she applied for a State bonus. Although she requests the medal be added to her record, they presume her request is actually for the Southwest Asia Service Medal, which is the appropriate award authorized for direct support of Operation DESERT STORM. Service members participating as regularly...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01554

    Original file (BC 2014 01554.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application so that he may receive the correct medal for his service. To be eligible, military personnel must have been attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground and/or shore operations; attached or regularly serving for one or more days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military operations; actually participating as a crew member in one or more...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02870

    Original file (BC 2014 02870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States, dated 23 July 1984, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve. The Outstanding Airman of the Year Ribbon is awarded to Airmen competing at Air Force level in the 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year Program. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 March 2015.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03602

    Original file (BC-2012-03602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Although the applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects that he served from 2 Aug 90 through 23 Feb 91, in support of Operation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01125

    Original file (BC 2014 01125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01125 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Foreign Service in Saudi Arabia during Operation DESERT STORM. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03904

    Original file (BC 2013 03904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) certificate dated 15 Jun 1998, for Operation SOUTHERN WATCH. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00825

    Original file (BC 2013 00825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00825 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In a letter dated 21 March 2012, DPSIDRA advised the applicant that his DD Form 214, dated 15 September 1993, states in Section 18 that he served in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM and that this statement only verifies that he...